Author: Guest

This is a guest blog post written by Nouf Al-Hoqani, Rayan Al-Hasni, Zahra Al-Balushi, and Zayd Al-Harrasi as part of their Decree Fellowship group project in July 2026.

Artificial intelligence has advanced significantly in recent years. AI systems can now generate text, compose music, and create images and other works. These advancements have also raised significant legal concerns, particularly regarding intellectual property rights. AI developers often use copyrighted materials to train AI models, raising the risk that these models will create counterfeit or derivative works belonging to other people. This issue has not yet been addressed under Omani law: there is no specific legal provision or regulation governing the relationship between AI and intellectual property. By contrast, jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union have already begun to grapple with the problem and to explore potential solutions. Oman should therefore begin addressing this issue, drawing on the experience of these jurisdictions to inform its own approach.

This is a guest blog post written by Aatika Al-Hinai, Mais Al-Hajri, Malak Al-Kharusi, and Mohammed Al-Lawati as part of their Decree Fellowship group project in July 2026.

The Personal Data Protection Law (Royal Decree No. 6/2022) has been in force since February 2023. It is Oman’s first comprehensive data protection statute, and a clear step forward from the single chapter of the Electronic Transactions Law that previously governed the field. Across its 32 articles, the PDPL grants data subjects a genuine set of rights and places clear obligations on controllers, giving the Sultanate a solid foundation to build on.

This policy brief examines that framework through the lens of data subject rights and identifies three areas where targeted refinement would strengthen it. First, the right of access could be broadened so that a copy of one’s data comes with the context needed to judge how it is being used. Second, a limited set of lawful bases could sit alongside consent, freeing consent to do its real work of protecting higher-risk processing. Third, a personal route to compensation could run alongside the Ministry’s enforcement role. Drawing on comparators including the UK GDPR and the Saudi and UAE frameworks, each reform builds on what the PDPL already does rather than reworking it.

This guest post is contributed by Raghd Al-Hosni—GRC Officer at OQAE.

The Sultanate of Oman is now a party to two of the most important international treaties governing cross border dispute resolution: The New York Convention, which deals with arbitration awards, and the Singapore Convention, which deals with settlement agreements resulting from mediation.

Now that it has been established that obtaining an Omani passport does not equate to obtaining Omani nationality, this post will explore the paths set by the Omani Nationality Law promulgated by Royal Decree 38/2014 for obtaining Omani nationality. Pursuant to this law, there are three paths for obtaining nationality in Oman: by origin, by reinstatement, and by grant from His Majesty the Sultan. This post will provide details on each one of these three paths.

A bilateral investment treaty (BIT) is an agreement between two states designed to encourage and protect investments made by nationals or companies from one country in the other. They provide legal assurances to investors, fostering a stable environment for cross-border investments. Many countries around the world have domestic laws that provide protection to foreign investors, for example, Oman has the Foreign Capital Investment Law, however, BITs make the duty to provide this protection a legal obligation under public international law and offer investors the ability to resort to international arbitration to enforce their rights under the BIT without the need to have a contract between the state and the investor that provides for arbitration.